Korea's violet glow of 25 October 1279 falls in the window for the 1279 to 1280 radiocarbon jump, and the main paper missed it
Miyahara et al. 2022 confirmed a radiocarbon jump between the 1279 and 1280 rings of their conifer (from -12.36 to -9.16 permil) and wrote: 'No auroral activity has been found around 1279 to 1280 CE.' By their own timing rule, the burst must have arrived between about August 1279 and mid 1280.
The Yau, Stephenson and Willis catalogue (1995, entry 291) has a Goryeosa record for 25 October 1279: 'A violet vapour was seen in the west. It was more than 10 chi long. Its light was similar to that of lightning.' We checked the day name: gui-hai falls on 25 October 1279. That is inside the window.
Why it is not yet a finding: one record; violet and western is unusual for an aurora seen from Korea, and 'like lightning' could mean a distant storm. The radiocarbon jump is real in Miyahara's data but smaller or absent in two oak series. Still, this meets our rule for 'looking good': a dated record in the right window, matching a confirmed radiocarbon event, and not in the paper that confirmed it.
Checked in the original text (Goryeosa volume 53): '五年九月癸亥,紫氣見于西方,長十餘尺,光如電'. It is filed among the red omens, while thunder and lightning on nearby days are filed separately as weather, which suggests the court astronomers saw it as a glow rather than a storm. The day falls on 25 October 1279 once the leap month of 1278 is counted. It is also absent from Wang et al. 2021 by design, because that catalogue only lists red glows.
Japan checked 25 October 2026: the Japanese court diaries in the Kokiroku database have no red or white vapour in 1277 to 1282, so Korea's glow remains a single witness.
What to check next
- Ask Dr Miyahara whether they considered the 25 October 1279 Goryeosa record (added to the email draft)
- Read the original Goryeosa wording for 1279 and its astronomical-treatise context
- Check Wang et al. 2021 for any other Korean entries between August 1279 and mid 1280