Why did the Xia dynasty fall (about 1600 to 1530 BC), and do the omens told of its end remember a real eruption?
Chinese tradition says the Xia, the first dynasty, ended when Tang of Shang beat King Jie at Mingtiao. Old books tie the end to strange skies and bad weather: Mozi (about 400 BC) says that under Jie 'sun and moon were out of time, cold and heat came mixed, the five grains scorched and died'; the Guoyu says 'the Yi and Luo rivers dried up and the Xia fell'; the Lushi Chunqiu (239 BC) says that after Tang won 'Heaven sent a great drought, five years without a harvest'. The 'current text' of the Bamboo Annals gives year-by-year entries: in Jie's 10th year 'the five planets moved in disorder', in his 29th 'three suns rose together', and a drought in Tang's years 19 to 24. Kevin Pang's JPL team (1989) used these to date the Thera eruption; David Pankenier tied the fall to a gathering of planets in 1576 BC. The capital at Erlitou (Yi-Luo valley) ends about 1530 to 1500 BC by radiocarbon.
Tests we ran on this
- No sign 0.23 Do the Bamboo Annals' sky and weather entries land on ice-core eruption years more than chance? 3 of 8 entries hit; chance would give that about 1 time in 4. (decided before looking, 2026-10-26) · scoreboard
- No sign 0.1 Was 1561-1546 BC unusually dry in the Qilian juniper rings? Somewhat: 50th driest of 486 sixteen-year windows. (decided before looking, 2026-10-26) · scoreboard
- Passed 0.03 Are the rings narrow two years after each of the 11 eruptions? Yes at 2 years, but 7 lags were tried, so about 0.2 really. (chosen after looking, 2026-10-26) · scoreboard
- No chance number Known answer: do the rings react to Aniakchak (1628 BC)? Yes: 1626 BC is one of the driest years (z -2.5), two years after. (decided before looking, 2026-10-26) · scoreboard
- No chance number Could all five planets be seen together in 1576 BC? No: all five were close only when 4 degrees from the Sun; only four could be seen (agrees with Keenan). (decided before looking, 2026-10-26) · scoreboard